Law firms and notaries
Professional secrecy, the mandate, the data and the practice's duties constrain architecture before convenience. I document those constraints and build proportionate search or automation, with external legal advice where interpretation is required.
Needs I take on
The practice archive, pleadings, correspondence and exhibits, indexed by meaning and queryable by matter with permissions applied
AI assistance under professional secrecy on a dedicated architecture: hosting, models, per-mandate permissions and logs designed for the duty
Repetitive production, from pleadings to exhibit schedules, carried by an engineered chain of preparation, checking and validation
What I put in place
- The practice archive indexed with permissions, metadata and verifiable citations, so passages can be found without confusing retrieval with legal validationDocument search →
- Local and hosted options compared by task: contract, access, retention, training use, logging, transfer, recovery and exitSecure AI assistants →
- Identity, secrets, mail and sharing assessed against agreed risks, with factual evidence and explicit limitsIdentity, directory and access →
To go deeper
Test the fit: Law firms and notaries
Describe the context, constraints and decision you need to make. The first conversation qualifies scope, boundaries and the next useful step.
Describe the situation